Architecture Tiers
Tier | Name | Agent Count | Complexity | Primary Use | Example Use Cases | API Endpoint |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 | Individual Agents | 1 | Low-Medium | Focused tasks | Content generation, data analysis, Q&A | /v1/agent/completions |
Tier 2 | Reasoning Agents | 1-2 (internal) | Medium-High | Complex reasoning | Mathematical proofs, logical validation, research | /v1/reasoning-agent/completions |
Tier 3 | Multi-Agent Swarms | 3-10,000+ | High | Enterprise workflows | Process automation, large-scale systems, R&D | /v1/swarm/completions |
Tier 1: Individual Agents
Single-purpose AI agents for focused tasks Individual agents are the foundation of the Swarms ecosystem. These are custom-built, single-purpose AI agents designed to handle specific tasks with high precision and efficiency. Key Characteristics- Single Agent: One AI model per agent
- Focused Purpose: Specialized for specific tasks
- Customizable: Full control over system prompts, tools, and behavior
- Efficient: Optimized for direct task execution
- Scalable: Can be combined into larger systems
- Content generation (articles, code, reports)
- Data analysis and processing
- Customer service responses
- Creative tasks (writing, design)
- Simple Q&A and information retrieval
- Tool execution and automation
Tier 2: Reasoning Agents
Advanced reasoning systems for complex problem-solving Reasoning agents leverage sophisticated reasoning techniques to solve complex problems that require deep analysis, multiple perspectives, and systematic thinking. These agents may internally use 1-2 specialized sub-agents to achieve their reasoning goals. Key Characteristics- Reasoning-Focused: Built for complex logical and analytical tasks
- Multi-Perspective: Can approach problems from different angles
- Iterative: Capable of refinement and improvement cycles
- Specialized Types: 7 different reasoning agent types available
- Internal Coordination: May use sub-agents for specialized reasoning
Agent Type | Description | Best For |
---|---|---|
reasoning-duo | Dual-agent system with perspective synthesis | Mathematical problems, logical proofs |
self-consistency | Multiple reasoning paths with validation | Complex logical problems, consistency checking |
ire | Iterative refinement approach | Complex analysis, research problems |
reasoning-agent | General-purpose systematic reasoning | Step-by-step problem solving |
consistency-agent | Logical consistency and contradiction detection | Argument validation |
ReflexionAgent | Self-reflection and bias detection | Meta-cognitive tasks |
GKPAgent | Cross-domain knowledge synthesis | Interdisciplinary problems |
- Mathematical proofs and complex calculations
- Logical consistency validation
- Research and analysis tasks
- Cross-domain problem solving
- Bias detection and ethical analysis
- Iterative improvement scenarios
Tier 3: Multi-Agent Swarms
Large-scale agent systems for complex workflows Multi-agent swarms represent the most sophisticated tier, capable of orchestrating anywhere from 3 to 10,000+ agents working together in coordinated workflows. These systems are designed for enterprise-scale applications and complex business processes. Key Characteristics- Massive Scale: 3 to 10,000+ agents per swarm
- Coordinated Workflows: Agents work together in structured processes
- Multiple Swarm Types: 12+ different swarm architectures available
- Enterprise-Grade: Built for complex business applications
- Dynamic Routing: Intelligent task distribution and agent selection
Swarm Type | Description | Agent Count | Best For |
---|---|---|---|
SequentialWorkflow | Linear task progression | 3-50 | Process automation, step-by-step workflows |
ConcurrentWorkflow | Parallel task execution | 5-100 | Parallel processing, independent tasks |
GroupChat | Interactive agent discussions | 3-20 | Collaborative problem solving, brainstorming |
MixtureOfAgents | Specialized agent selection | 5-200 | Complex tasks requiring multiple expertise areas |
MajorityVoting | Consensus-based decision making | 5-50 | Decision making, validation tasks |
CouncilAsAJudge | Expert panel with final judge | 5-30 | Expert evaluation, quality assessment |
InteractiveGroupChat | Real-time agent interactions | 3-15 | Dynamic problem solving, real-time collaboration |
AgentRearrange | Dynamic agent reordering | 3-100 | Adaptive workflows, optimization |
MultiAgentRouter | Intelligent task routing | 10-500 | Large-scale task distribution |
HiearchicalSwarm | Nested agent hierarchies | 10-1000 | Complex organizational structures |
AutoSwarmBuilder | Automatic swarm construction | 5-200 | Dynamic swarm creation, optimization |
MALT | Multi-agent learning and training | 10-10000+ | Large-scale learning systems |
- Enterprise process automation
- Large-scale data processing
- Complex decision-making systems
- Research and development workflows
- Customer service automation
- Content creation pipelines
- Quality assurance systems
- Dynamic resource allocation
Architecture Comparison
Aspect | Individual Agents | Reasoning Agents | Multi-Agent Swarms |
---|---|---|---|
Agent Count | 1 | 1-2 (internal) | 3-10,000+ |
Complexity | Low-Medium | Medium-High | High-Extreme |
Use Case | Focused tasks | Complex reasoning | Enterprise workflows |
Setup Time | Minutes | Minutes-Hours | Hours-Days |
Resource Usage | Low | Medium | High |
Scalability | Individual | Limited | Massive |
Cost | Low | Medium | High |
Maintenance | Simple | Moderate | Complex |
Choosing the Right Architecture
When to Use Individual Agents
- ✅ Single, well-defined tasks
- ✅ Quick prototyping and testing
- ✅ Resource-constrained environments
- ✅ Simple automation needs
- ✅ Cost-sensitive applications
When to Use Reasoning Agents
- ✅ Complex problem-solving tasks
- ✅ Tasks requiring multiple perspectives
- ✅ Logical consistency validation
- ✅ Research and analysis work
- ✅ Tasks requiring iterative improvement
When to Use Multi-Agent Swarms
- ✅ Complex business processes
- ✅ Large-scale automation
- ✅ Multi-step workflows
- ✅ Enterprise applications
- ✅ Tasks requiring multiple expertise areas
- ✅ Dynamic, adaptive systems
Integration Patterns
Hybrid Approaches
You can combine different tiers for optimal results:- Individual + Reasoning: Use individual agents for data collection, reasoning agents for analysis
- Reasoning + Swarms: Use reasoning agents within swarms for complex decision-making
- All Three Tiers: Individual agents for data processing, reasoning agents for analysis, swarms for orchestration
Migration Paths
- Start Simple: Begin with individual agents, upgrade to reasoning agents for complex tasks
- Scale Up: Move from reasoning agents to swarms for enterprise needs
- Optimize: Use reasoning agents within swarms for enhanced decision-making
Performance Considerations
Individual Agents
- Latency: 1-5 seconds
- Throughput: High (1000+ requests/minute)
- Cost: $0.01-0.10 per request
- Memory: Minimal
Reasoning Agents
- Latency: 5-30 seconds
- Throughput: Medium (100-500 requests/minute)
- Cost: $0.05-0.50 per request
- Memory: Moderate
Multi-Agent Swarms
- Latency: 30 seconds - 10 minutes
- Throughput: Variable (10-100 requests/minute)
- Cost: $0.10-5.00 per request
- Memory: High
Best Practices
1. Start with the Right Tier
- Begin with individual agents for simple tasks
- Upgrade to reasoning agents when complexity increases
- Use swarms only when necessary for scale
2. Optimize for Your Use Case
- Match agent capabilities to task requirements
- Consider cost vs. performance trade-offs
- Plan for scalability from the start
3. Monitor and Iterate
- Track performance metrics across all tiers
- Optimize based on usage patterns
- Consider hybrid approaches for complex needs
Getting Started
Quick Start Guide
- Get API Key: https://swarms.world/platform/api-keys
- Choose Your Tier: Start with individual agents for simple tasks
- Build and Test: Create your first agent and test functionality
- Scale Up: Move to reasoning agents or swarms as needed
Support and Community
- Technical Support: Book a Call
- Community: Join our Discord
- Updates: Follow us on Twitter